Corals and the Great Barrier Reef
|Posted by Administrator (admin) on 8th February, 2010|
For the recent years it is claimed that:
1) pH decreases markedly in the oceans today. (see ”pH in Oceans”) and that
2) CO2 in oceans increases markedly today (se ”CO2 in oceans”) and that
3) de global temperatures are increasingtoday (see ”Temperatures, global”).
Further, it is claimed that
4) Corals are threatened and that
5) this is due to the trends mentioned above for pH, CO2 and temperatures
The extend of The Great Barrier Reef. The period 1903-22 is compared with the period 1979-98. The reef has become bigger. Craig Idso´s article, ”Coral reefs”: http://www.co2science.org/education/reports/corals/coralreefs.pdf
The Great Barrier Rreef is claimed to be decreasing base don data from ”De’ath et al 2009”:
We can conclude that Craig Idso´s graphic shown aboveis fairly correct. GBR has bigger extend in 1979-1998 than it was in 1903-1922. And further:
Fig. A : We see a significant growing trend through all of the 20´eth century for the GBR.
Fig. B Red/Blue graph inserted by us shows another significant trend: GBR is grown in periods with warming... So definitely it is not confirmed that heat is damaging corals, on the contrary.
These messages are surprisingly clear from 6the data used by De’ ath , and still it has not been mentioned by De’ ath.
No instead De’ aths message is focussing on the years 1998-2005, especially just 2 years 2004-5. Two years, a tiny period for significant conclusions?
And it gets worse: De pink area indicates number of testseries from GBR. In te years after 1998 where GBR extend is decreasing, also the number of data series is decreasing, first to 10-12 series and in 2005 the result is based on 2 datasets (TWO). So, the catastrophic situation for GBR is base don just 2 years and as just very few datasets.
This methodic I astonishing resembling the typical climategate methods, see for instance ”Climategate, The Yamal scandal..” – where just one tree held most of the warming trend used to claim global warming trend for Northern Siberia in a very often used dataset.
Here a thought fro a blogger on Climate Audit:
The GBR suffered severely due to the super El Nino 1998 (resulting in “bleaching”) and has ever since been recovering. And so, the blogger finds it peculiar why De´ath chooses not to show al data sets from GBR all the way to 2005. These shows the recovery of GBR. And yes, again it reminds you of classic climategate methods.
It turns out that
More on the subject by Craig Idso: http://www.heartland.org/bin/media/newyork09/PowerPoint/Craig_Idso.ppt#283,21,The%2020th%20Century%20Impact%20on%20Emiliania%20huxleyi
Discussion, The Australian: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/scientists-crying-wolf-over-coral/story-e6frg6xf-1225811910634
Last changed: 9th February, 2010 at 11:02:01Back
|By Unknown on 31st March, 2010 at 01:15:56|
|Good evening, JG Collins
I read your comment regarding proofreading/editing - and thanks for your interest!
We cannot pay any money for your help - but obviously you are very welcome indeed to do some editing :-)
You can send any corrections to firstname.lastname@example.org
K.R. Frank Lansner - and thanks again
|Proofreading||By Unknown on 30th March, 2010 at 20:13:09|
|This is obviously an early draft and needs to be edited. Please contact me regarding high quality editing services with fast turn-around.
JG Collins, BS Engr
(dances with email@example.com)